PEER REVIEW POLICY
Fine Arts Journal of Global Review (FAJGR) is committed to maintaining the highest standards of academic quality through a fair, transparent, and rigorous double-blind peer-review process. The journal ensures that all submitted manuscripts are evaluated solely on their scholarly merit, originality, relevance, methodological quality, and contribution to the field of fine arts.
Each manuscript first undergoes an initial editorial assessment to verify its suitability for the journal's scope and compliance with submission requirements. Manuscripts that successfully pass this stage are forwarded to independent experts for a double-blind peer review, where the identities of both authors and reviewers remain confidential throughout the review process.
Initial Editorial Screening
All submissions are reviewed by the Editorial Office to assess originality, relevance to the journal's scope, formatting compliance, and adherence to ethical publishing standards before being sent for peer review.
Double-Blind Peer Review
Eligible manuscripts are evaluated by qualified independent reviewers. The identities of both authors and reviewers remain anonymous to ensure an objective, unbiased, and confidential review process.
Reviewer Evaluation
Reviewers assess manuscripts based on originality, academic significance, research methodology, clarity of presentation, ethical compliance, and the overall contribution to the field of fine arts.
Editorial Decision
The Editor-in-Chief and Editorial Board make the final publication decision after carefully considering the reviewers' recommendations. Authors may receive one of the following decisions:
- Accept
- Minor Revision
- Major Revision
- Reject
Confidentiality
All manuscripts and reviewer reports are treated as confidential documents. Reviewers and editors must not disclose or use unpublished information for personal or professional advantage.
Publication Ethics
The journal follows internationally accepted publication ethics throughout the peer-review process, ensuring fairness, transparency, impartiality, and academic integrity in every editorial decision.
